• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

You are not logged in You are not logged in to this journal. Log In

J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 27, 2558 (2009); http://dx.doi.org/10.1116/1.3259960 (5 pages)

Amino-propyl-triethoxy-silane on aluminum fiducial grids for spatial-phase-locked electron-beam lithography

C. B. Samantaray and J. T. Hastings

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506-0046

View MapView Map

(Published online 1 December 2009)

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF | Rent Article | Buy PDF (US$28) | View Cart
A new fiducial grid suitable for low-energy (1–5 keV) spatial-phase locked electron-beam lithography (SPLEBL) has been developed based on an aluminum layer with an organosilane grid pattern. The grids (400 nm period) were made of two to three layers of 3-amino-propyl-triethoxy-silane (APTES) that was microcontact printed onto Al coated polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were measured at beam energies ranging from 1 to 5 keV at a dose of 20 μC/cm2 and compared to the SNRs of octadecanethiol (ODT) based fiducial grids on Au, Ag, and Cu. Although fiducial grids made of ODT on Au provided excellent SNR, Au is not suitable because of poor penetration and strong scattering of the primary electrons. ODT based grids on lower atomic number metal such as Ag or Cu yielded inadequate SNRs. In contrast, APTES-based grids on Al provide SNRs approaching ODT on Au with greatly reduced electron scattering. The authors successfully developed a grid removal process that allows patterns to be resolved in the underlying PMMA. These results represent a key step in the development of low-energy SPLEBL.

© 2009 American Vacuum Society

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CMMI-0609241. Electron-beam lithography and nanofabrication infrastructure was partially supported by NSF EPSCOR Award No. EPS-0447479. Experiments at the University of Kentucky were conducted within the Center for Nanoscale Science and Engineering (CeNSE). Brian Wajdyk and Chuck May provided valuable technical assistance.

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. EXPERIMENT
  3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
  4. CONCLUSIONS

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

  • 85.40.Hp

    Lithography, masks and pattern transfer

  • 81.16.Nd

    Micro- and nanolithography

  • 81.05.Lg

    Polymers and plastics; rubber; synthetic and natural fibers; organometallic and organic materials

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

1071-1023 (print)  
1520-8567 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.


Figures (6) Tables (1)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)


Close

close