• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

You are not logged in You are not logged in to this journal. Log In

J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 28, C2A90 (2010); http://dx.doi.org/10.1116/1.3360302 (4 pages)

Experimental evaluation of the influence of shank shape of field ion emitter on the angular current density

Y. Kobayashi1, Y. Sugiyama2, Y. Morikawa1, K. Kajiwara3, and K. Hata3

1Graduate School of Engineering, Mie University, 1577 Kurima-Machiya, Tsu 514-8507, Japan
2Graduate School of Engineering, Mie University, 1577 Kurima-Machiya, Tsu 514-8507, Japan, Center for Ultimate Technology on Nano-Electronics (CUTE), Mie University, 1577 Kurima-Machiya, Tsu 514-8507, Japan, and SII NanoTechnology Inc., 36-1 Takenoshita, Oyama-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka 410-1393, Japan
3Graduate School of Engineering, Mie University, 1577 Kurima-Machiya, Tsu 514-8507, Japan and Center for Ultimate Technology on Nano-Electronics (CUTE), Mie University, 1577 Kurima-Machiya, Tsu 514-8507, Japan

View MapView Map

(Published online 1 April 2010)

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF | Rent Article | Buy PDF (US$28) | View Cart
An adequate emitter shape for a gas field ion source was investigated to obtain a higher angular current density, dI/dΩ. Single-crystalline 〈111〉-oriented tungsten emitters having a similar tip radius of curvature and a different taper angle of emitter shank were prepared by dc- and ac-electrochemical polishing. The tip apex of the emitters was terminated with a tungsten trimer by means of remolding and a field evaporation processes. The helium ion currents emitted from these trimers were measured as a function of helium pressure. The ion current and the dI/dΩ obtained from the emitter with a taper angle of 1.5° were enhanced by factors of 2.7 and of 3.9, respectively, compared to those from an emitter with a taper angle of 14.5°. These experimental results suggest that to obtain a higher dI/dΩ, the emitter having a narrower taper angle is better.

© 2010 American Vacuum Society

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was promoted by the national project for elemental technology for next-generation electron microscopy, sponsored by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. EXPERIMENT
  3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
  4. CONCLUSION

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

  • 85.45.Db

    Field emitters and arrays, cold electron emitters

  • 81.65.Ps

    Polishing, grinding, surface finishing

  • 79.70.+q

    Field emission, ionization, evaporation, and desorption

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

1071-1023 (print)  
1520-8567 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.

Figures (5) Tables (1)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)


Close

close