• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

You are not logged in You are not logged in to this journal. Log In

J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 30, 02B106 (2012); http://dx.doi.org/10.1116/1.3672026 (5 pages)

Structural properties of InAs/InAs1–xSbx type-II superlattices grown by molecular beam epitaxy

Lu Ouyang1, Elizabeth H. Steenbergen2, Yong-Hang Zhang2, Kalyan Nunna3, Diana L. Huffaker3, and David J. Smith4

1Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287
2School of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering and Center for Photonics Innovation, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287
3California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095
4Department of Physics and Center for Photonics Innovation, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287

View MapView Map

(Published online 21 December 2011)

Full Text: Read Online (HTML) | Download PDF | Rent Article | Buy PDF (US$28) | View Cart
Strain-balanced InAs/InAs1−xSbx type-II superlattices (SLs) have been proposed for possible long-wavelength infrared applications. This paper reports a detailed structural characterization study of InAs/InAs1−xSbx SLs with varied Sb composition grown on GaSb (001) substrates by modulated and conventional molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). X-ray diffraction was used to determine the SL periods and the average composition of the InAs1−xSbx alloy layers. Cross-section transmission electron micrographs revealed the separate In(As)Sb/InAs(Sb) ordered-alloy layers within individual InAs1−xSbx layers for SLs grown by modulated MBE. For the SLs grown by conventional MBE, examination by high-resolution electron microscopy revealed that interfaces for InAs1−xSbx deposited on InAs were more abrupt, relative to InAs deposited on InAs1−xSbx: this feature was attributed to Sb surfactant segregation occurring during the SL growth. Overall, these results establish that strain-balanced SL structures with excellent crystallinity can be achieved with proper design (well thickness versus Sb composition) and suitably optimized growth conditions.

© 2012 American Vacuum Society

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The work at ASU was primarily supported by the MURI Grant No. W911NF-10-1-0524 administered by U.S. Army Research Office, and monitored by William W. Clark. The authors gratefully acknowledge the use of facilities in the John M. Cowley Center for High Resolution Electron Microscopy at Arizona State University.

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
  3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSTION
  4. SUMMARY

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

  • 81.15.Hi

    Molecular, atomic, ion, and chemical beam epitaxy

  • 82.70.Uv

    Surfactants, micellar solutions, vesicles, lamellae, amphiphilic systems, (hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions)

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

1071-1023 (print)  
1520-8567 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.

Figures (8) Tables (1)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)


Close

close